Re: question concerning branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:45, Ingo Brueckl<ib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> But as software development often is something where you are coding on
> several issues at the same time which can't be committed immediately, it
> sounds that 'stash' is the developer's best friend.
>
> Ingo
>

There is no problem with having temporary commits on local branches,
however.

Quite frequently, I'll "git commit -a -m 'Temp commit'; git checkout
other-branch".  As long as you don't make these temporary commits
public, it's very easy to munge them (See: "git rebase --interactive
<commitish>", and "git reset --soft <commitish>").

-Jacob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]