On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:45, Ingo Brueckl<ib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But as software development often is something where you are coding on > several issues at the same time which can't be committed immediately, it > sounds that 'stash' is the developer's best friend. > > Ingo > There is no problem with having temporary commits on local branches, however. Quite frequently, I'll "git commit -a -m 'Temp commit'; git checkout other-branch". As long as you don't make these temporary commits public, it's very easy to munge them (See: "git rebase --interactive <commitish>", and "git reset --soft <commitish>"). -Jacob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html