On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 04:45:40PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Should this actually be "git stash save --invalid-option", since it is > > really testing the actual save option parsing, and not the behavior to > > automatically push options to "git stash save"? > > It would be ideal if > > git stash save --invalid-option > > failed, while > > git stash --invalid-option should be trapped > > and/or > > git stash "--invalid-option should be trapped" > > are accepted as valid quickie ways to name a WIP stash before attending to > an unrelated emergency. I thought that was the exact DWIM that was rejected previously so that you don't accidentally make commits with "git stash llist" or "git stash --almost-a-valid-optio". -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html