On Wed, 15 Aug 2009, Mark A Rada wrote: > On 10-Aug-09, at 4:55 AM, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Thanks. That sounds like an ancient bug that in turn perhaps >>> suggests nobody uses instaweb. Will apply to 'maint'.. >> >> Hmmm... taking a peek at current "Git User's Survey 2009" results >> http://www.survs.com/shareResults?survey=2PIMZGU0&rndm=678J66QRA2 >> >> 11. What Git interfaces, implementations, frontends and tools do you >> use? >> >> git-instaweb 3% 77 / 2712 >> >> 16. How often do you use the following forms of git commands or extra >> git tools? >> >> git instaweb >> never: 1983 - 79% >> rarely: 208 - 8% >> sometimes: 50 - 2% >> often: 9 - 0% >> >> Total respondents 2506 >> > > Does this means it may be taken off the menu in the not too distant > future or deprecated? I don't think so. We keep git-relink, which almost nobody uses, and few know what it does. I guess that git-instaweb is not advertised enough, but that might change, as Scott Chacon in "Pro Git" mentions / covers git-instaweb. P.S. I'd like to create GIT::Web, which would use (contrary to gitweb) many CPAN modules (and PAR to help installing it with dependencies), which would use HTTP::Engine (and therefore run as CGI, FastCGI, mod_perl and standalone HTTP::Server::Simple), and be similar in structure to SVN::Web. With it using HTTP::Server::Simple git-instaweb would be needed less... But it is in "Duke Nuke Forever" (or packv4 ;-) future... -- Jakub Narebski Poland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html