El Wed, 12-08-2009 a las 09:45 -0400, Jason Merrill escribió: > On 08/12/2009 06:56 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > > The git repository format should support concurrent access, but perhaps > > it only applies to git-receive-pack, not fancy operations such as > > repacking. > > The git repository format, yes, but maybe not the stuff in .git/svn. It > seems like a temporary index file was referring to an object that got > garbage collected away. Or maybe the index file was left over from the > initial import, and not there due to a collision; there don't seem to be > index files there normally. git-svn might be keeping extra information in files that the other git tools don't know about. This would explain why some objects looked like orphans and were thus culled. [cc'ing the git list to catch the attention of the git-svn maintainer(s)]. Ah, and I just fixed a problem I have introduced myself while fiddling to recover the repository: HEAD should point at "refs/remotes/trunk", otherwise new commits won't show up in gitweb. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html