Re: [PATCH] Re: [TRIVIAL] Documentation: merge: one <remote> is required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 13:31 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I do not have any objection to make sure that we uniformly use ellipses
> for one-or-more (and enclose them in [] if we want zero-or-more).  Are
> these two that your patch touched the only ones that need fixing?

I guess not (these two were the ones that annoyed me enough to write
patches when I read them in order to learn more about the commands they
described).

What is the best way to fix small issues like this: one set of patches
that tries to fix as much as possible in one go or a stream of little
patches whenever similar issues are found in one of the documents?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]