2009/8/4 Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > - if {![string match "*/HEAD" $name]} {
>> > + if {![string match "*/HEAD" $name] && !$hideremotes} {
>>
>> Hmm, I wonder if it would be more useful to extend this by using $skiprefs
>> pattern instead, like so:
> [...]
>> + if {$skiprefs != "" && [string match $skiprefs $name]} continue
>
> Shortly after sending the patch, I had another idea: how about an
> option to only show refs that were given on the command line, if any?
> That way 'gitk --branches' or 'gitk HEAD' would hide the whole remotes
> mess (and of course also all other refs in the process). I think I
> might be able to voodoo enough Tk to implement this.
Another possibility could be to have just an indication that the
commit has branches and/or tags pointing to it. Maybe just as it is
now but without the branch/tag name.
To mimic the current UI it could be:
o-<|-|_| Commit summary
with:
o the current circle
<| a yellow triangle
|_| a green square
and then if you click on them you could get the current view, or a
list of branches/tags in the lower panel.
my 2 cents,
Santi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html