Hi, On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Reece Dunn wrote: > 2009/7/28 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>: > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > >> Documentation/git-shim.txt | 37 +++++++++ > > > > May I re-register my complaint about the naming? > > > > I mean, yes, I could think of something even worse when it comes to the > > (ridiculously bad!) tradition of naming things "porcelain", "plumbing" and > > "potty", especially when it comes to "pushing objects" and > > then "pulling". > > > > But now that we had a good laugh, it is time to get serious again, and > > give this child a _way_ better name. > > > > I mean, you already had a good name for your foreign scm series. Why did > > you give that up in favor of this lousy naming? > > How about git-http? If 'git-fetch' learns to search for a helper by the name of the protocol (as it should learn), this will obviously fail with svn://. Ciao, Dscho