> With svn, it is possible to commit to (or create) several branches or > tags in one go (i.e. revision), whereas with git those would be > individual commits. I don't think this explains a difference of about 20000 commits. > difference, although it is very large. Have you checked whether git-svn > produced the (number of) branches and tags that you expect? I can't exactly tell, if all the branches are correct, because a lot of the branches already have been merged and deleted in the SVN repository. I checked the "git log --all" output with a small script to see, where multiple commits belong to the same SVN revision (according to the git-svn-id. Some SVN revions have up to 4 commits. If I check some of these commits with `git branch --contains` then it seems only one of the commits belongs to branch. Is it possible, that a commit doesn't belong to any branch? Tobias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html