Re: Performance issue of 'git branch'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, david@xxxxxxx wrote:

what does the performance look like if you just do a static compile instead?

I don't even know - I don't have a static version of curl. I could install
one, of course, but since I don't think that's the solution anyway, I'm
not going to bother.

I wasn't thinking a static version of curl, I was thinking a static version of the git binaries. see how fast things could be if no startup linking was nessasary.

David Lang

The real solution really is to not have curl support in the main binary.

One option might be to make _all_ the transport code be outside of the
core binary, or course.  That's a fairly simple but somewhat sad solution
(ie make all of push/pull/fetch/clone/ls-remote/etc be external binaries)

		Linus

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]