Re: [PATCH 2/3] refactor: use bitsizeof() instead of 8 * sizeof()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:34:34PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
>>  #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]))
>> +#define bitsizeof(x)  (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(x))
>
> Isn't our style to use all-caps for macros? I.e., BITSIZEOF?

Perhaps but I'd say similarity between sizeof() and bitsizeof() calls for
consistency in the lowercase in this particular case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]