Brandon Casey <brandon.casey.ctr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From configure.ac, but re-nested: > > AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init], > [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=], > [AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init], > [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=], > [NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])]) Yuck. > should it rather be: > > AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init], > [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=], > [AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init], > [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease], > [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO= NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])]) We expect to find SHA1_Init in -lcrypto, and if we find it there we do not do anything funky. If we do not find it in -lcrypto, we try -lssl and if we find it then we know we do need -lssl when saying -lcrypto. Otherwise we do not seem to have OpenSSL. That is how I read your version, and it makes perfect sense to me. > Notice the pairing of "action" parameters to the inner AC_CHECK_LIB(). > The first one seems to set, and then unset NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO. Not > sure what is going on there. Was the unsetting of NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO > supposed to go into the action-if-not-found section? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html