Re: Subversion-style incrementing revision numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Joel Dice wrote:

> The scenario I envision is several developers, each with a clone of a 
> shared repository.  The clones would not have IRNs turned on, only the 
> shared repository.  So, when I do a "git push", I get an IRN back, and I 
> am not confused, because I know that IRN only applies to the shared 
> repository. Then, when I mark a Bugzilla bug as fixed and attach the IRN 
> to it, everybody knows that IRN refers to the shared repository.  After 
> all, I wouldn't mark the bug fixed if I had only committed it to my own 
> private repository.

Why not just tag the commit with something like "bugzilla/#bugid"? 
Granted, it makes for lots of tags. But we actually handle lots of tags.

BTW if your IRN just wants to serve to be less cryptic than SHA1s, you can 
try git-name-rev (of course, it is only immutable if you have a recent 
tag and use the --tags option).

Ciao,
Dscho
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]