Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.6.4.rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Is there some sort of guide to the new best practices for handling
trees such as git.kernel.org, where one pushes into "foo.git"
directly, and there is no checked-out source code at all?

I think old repositories will be helped if you add

	[core]
        	bare

to their foo.git/config files.

Thanks.  What about cloning new repositories?  Real world example:

Local workstation has /spare/repo/cld/.git repository, with checked-out working tree.

I want to publish this tree to the world via a *.kernel.org-like system, so my task is to

	scp -r /spare/repo/cld/.git remote.example.com:/pub/scm/cld.git

but if I do this with scp, then future pushes to remote.example.com:/pub/scm/cld.git emit the warning about updating the currently checked-out branch -- even though there are no checked-out files. The checked-out files were not copied in the scp.

Regards,

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]