Re: Dividing up a large merge.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:34:26PM -0700, Avery Pennarun wrote:

> How about having one person do the merge, then commit it (including
> conflict markers), then have other people just make a series of
> commits removing the conflict markers?

I guess this helps in some sense, but the intermediate result
isn't going to build, and things like mergetool aren't going to
work.  It's helpful for the individuals to have the full merge
conflict available, or at least the stages of the files in
question.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]