Kjetil Barvik <barvik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I have looked at and tested (the version from the origin/pu branch, so > it contains the memset() line squashed in) patch 5/3, 6/3 and 7/3, and > all 3 patches looks correct, so you can add > > Reviewed-and-tested-by: Kjetil Barvik > > if you want to. Thanks. > But, I guess it is me which is a litle late to comment things, since I > already see that all 3 patches is in the pu, next and master branches > already, less than 3 days after beeing posted to the malinglist. > > But, would'nt it be a good thing to let all patches at least be in the > pu branch for minimum x days before entering next and master? Or: let > it go minimum x days after beeing posted to the list before entering > the next and master branch? x = 4? That number x depends on the quality of the patches and to a great extent how well I know the area of the code affected by the patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html