On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Linus
Torvalds<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I complained to the CIFS people about their crazy duplicated commit
> message headers: see for example
>
> [torvalds@nehalem linux]$ git show --stat aeaaf253c4dee7ff9af2f3f0595f3bb66964e944
> commit aeaaf253c4dee7ff9af2f3f0595f3bb66964e944
> Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu Jul 9 01:46:39 2009 -0400
>
> cifs: remove cifsInodeInfo->inUse counter
>
> cifs: remove cifsInodeInfo->inUse counter
>
> It was purported to be a refcounter of some sort, but was never
> used that way. It never served any purpose that wasn't served equally well
> by the I_NEW flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 1 -
> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> and note the duplicated "cifs: remove cifsInodeInfo->inUse counter" line.
>
> It turns out that that duplication is because they use gitweb as a strange
> patch distribution system (rather than emailing each other patches), and
> download the 'commitdiff_plain' version of the diff and then apply it with
> 'git am -s'.
>
> Ok, so it's a really odd way of doing things, but hey, that gitweb feature
> clearly does try to support that exact workflow, or why would that
> commitdiff_plain output try to look like an email?
>
> But gitweb is a totally buggy piece of trash when it comes to exporting
> commits that way.
>
> Why? Because it first has a 'Subject:' line, and then the "body" of the
> email repeats the raw commit message output. So _of_course_ you get the
> header duplicated.
>
> Now, I asked Steve to not use gitweb (or edit the result some way), but
> this really is a gitweb bug. And since I don't do perl, I can't fix it,
> even though I can pinpoint exactly where the bug is (lines 5732 - 5752 in
> gitweb/gitweb.perl).
>
> I totally untested patch written by a monkey who doesn't actually do perl
> is appended as a purely theoretical pointer in the right direction. But I
> really have no clue about perl, so what the heck do I know? This is like
> my tcl programming - pattern matching rather than any real understanding.
>
> I'm sure there are smarter ways to do this with some simple mapping
> function or whatever.
The smarter way is called the 'patches' ('patch' for single ones, e.g.
http://git.example.com/project.git/patch/master, whereas /patches/
would display the latest N with N configurable) view that just spouts
out the git format-patch output in a git-am friendly way. I'm pretty
sure my patches to implement that view are already upstream ... yes,
yes it is:
http://git.oblomov.eu/git/patches/9872cd..75bf2cb2
To understand the differences between this and commitdiff_plain, see
http://git.oblomov.eu/git/commitdiff_plain/9872cd..75bf2cb2
for comparison.
And yes, commitdiff is just TOTALLY not what you expect it to be,
ESPECIALLY with multiple commits, where it only displays the commit
message for the FIRST commit.
So tell the CIFS people to use the patch(es) view if they plan to use
gitweb for patch exchange (which I do all the time, and in fact was
the reason why I implemented this view in the first place).
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html