Re: Pushing to GitHub doesn't push all branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Graeme Geldenhuys venit, vidit, dixit 10.07.2009 17:07:
> Michael J Gruber wrote:
>>
>> You really mirrored your repo: All your "lost" branches are remotes on
>> the github side as well. That has two consequences:
> 
> The two branches that are of most importance to me, is "trunk" and 
> "fixes_2_2" as found in the SubVersion repository.
> 
> refs/remotes/trunk
> refs/remotes/fixes_2_2
> 
> 
> So should I have only pushed the above mentioned branches, but as "true" 
> heads in GitHub. Geesh, I hope I am understanding what I am typing, 
> because I feel a bit lost now. :-)
> 
> Is there any way to clean up the mess available on GitGub? So that 'git 
> ls-remote ...' will only show the real remotes.... Or should there be no 
> remotes on GitHub?
> 
> Sorry, I'm fairly new to Git and it feels like I jumped into the deap 
> end here. ;-)
> 
>> (assuming there are only svn branches) into proper heads on github, i.e.
>> a refspec like '+refs/remotes/*:refs/*' for your pushes.
> 
> I'll read the man pages on what that refspec means...  If I manage to 
> only push 'trunk' which is master under git and 'fixes_2_2' which will 
> be some other name under git, how to I keep both those in sync with the 
> SubVersion repository.
> 
> At the moment I have a cronjob that executes the following every 30 minutes.
> ====================
> cd /mnt/samba/git/fpc.git/
> $GIT checkout master
> $GIT svn rebase
> $GIT gc --auto
> $GIT push origin master
> ====================
> 
> Does 'git svn rebase' get all branch or does it just update "master" 
> (Trunk from SubVersion)?
> 
> I apologise for all the questions...

Please don't! That's what we're here for ;)

A while ago I suggested that by default, no clone (whether git or
git-svn) should have a master branch. I guess your example shows why. If
you use that repo (/mnt/samba/git/fpc.git) only for converting from svn
to git, not for doing local work, then you don't need any master branch.
But git-svn will stubbornly recreate one.

Similarly (under the same assumption), you don't need to rebase at all.
All you need is "git svn fetch", which populates the branches under
remotes/.

You can safely delete the bogus remote branches on github using

git push origin :refs/remotes/trunk

etc., i.e.

git for-each-ref --shell --format="git push -f origin :%(refname)"
refs/remotes/|while read line; do eval $line;done

(all on one line)

Then it's probably beneficial to do something like

git config remote.origin.push '+refs/remotes/*:refs/heads/*'

so that you have a nice default refspec for origin. [You may think about
renaming origin to destination, though ;) ]

Cheers,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]