On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:14:46AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: > (We don't yet have an implementation of fsync() :-( ) Why? It appears rather straightforward to me. Here is a patch that implements it. Or did I miss something? Warning: I do not use MinGW/Git, so I have not tested this patch. -- >8 -- >From 0a5e712ff8775e0f27923bedcb3c234288592eaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:45:30 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] mingw: fsync implementation for Windows Signed-off-by: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@xxxxxxxxx> --- compat/mingw.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ compat/mingw.h | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/compat/mingw.c b/compat/mingw.c index bed4178..65c9e8e 100644 --- a/compat/mingw.c +++ b/compat/mingw.c @@ -1231,3 +1231,19 @@ struct dirent *mingw_readdir(DIR *dir) return (struct dirent*)&dir->dd_dir; } #endif // !NO_MINGW_REPLACE_READDIR + +int fsync(int fd) +{ + HANDLE h = (HANDLE) _get_osfhandle(fd); + if (h == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) + { + errno = EBADF; + return -1; + } + if (!FlushFileBuffers(h)) + { + errno = err_win_to_posix(GetLastError()); + return -1; + } + return 0; +} diff --git a/compat/mingw.h b/compat/mingw.h index 4f7ba4c..14d53c0 100644 --- a/compat/mingw.h +++ b/compat/mingw.h @@ -75,8 +75,7 @@ static inline int fork(void) { errno = ENOSYS; return -1; } static inline unsigned int alarm(unsigned int seconds) { return 0; } -static inline int fsync(int fd) -{ return 0; } +int fsync(int fd); static inline int getppid(void) { return 1; } static inline void sync(void) -- 1.6.2.3 -- >8 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html