Hi, On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Robert Stonehouse wrote: > featureA (which was a new build target) was broken at HEAD. It had been > developed on the featureA branch. After featureA was merged into master, > featureB (which had branched from master at the same point as featureA) > was merged with master. Why don't you just mark the merge commit that introduced featureA as bad, then? Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html