Re: git svn's performance on cloning mono's branches/tags...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Hin-Tak Leung<hintak.leung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> the tags, branches, url entries are effectively the same, I think - so
> the main difference is using trunk instead of fetch.
> Why does it make any difference? The example at the bottom of
> git-svn's man page uses the trunk notation. Maybe it should be
> changed?
>

To answer my question - I think the man page should be updated.

Also, while searching 'git svn speed', I found that a git clone of
mono is available:
http://www.mono-project.com/GitSVN
A shame this page is not referenced my other devel resources on mono's
web site at all... also it uses a real user's account to make the
clone (rather than annonymous svn), so to update the git clone by
git-svn, one needs a real dev account - that is not a problem for the
purpose of sending in patches as the occasional dev.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]