Hi Allan, On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Allan Wind wrote: > If you do not mind having a full repository on the web servers, > then pushing changes might work better. This appears to be what > you are doing now though. No, at the moment we have built our own version of a content addressable filesystem and are distributing changes to it. We have symlinks to real file names. I just thought, that git can do sth. similiar with its core, before trying to solve a solved problem :-) > If I had to scale this I would probably build a master image > (either locally or remotely) and use rsync to distribute the > content instead of git. We do sth. similiar at the moment. De-duplication is important, because web people copy lots of data for images and flash around when doing things. > > - Nearly atomic update of file tree (easy to implement outside git) > > stow can be handy for this. Ah! Will have a look. Many Thanks! Best Regards Ingo Oeser -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html