On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 12:33 -0400, Junio C Hamano wrote: > So I can see why a variant of "squash" that does not change (nor even ask > for a replacement of) the commit log message from the one that is being > amended could be useful. I am tempted to suggest calling that a "fixup" > operation, but some people may expect "fixup" to mean a variant of "edit" > that does not bother you by dropping you back to the shell to touch the > tree that is recorded (i.e. "fixing up the commit log message only"), so > it is not a very good word. I wonder if a better approach might be to add an operator to squash rather than another verb. "squash!" maybe? This has the nice property that future verbs that have both interactive and non-interactive modes could be made consistent with squash easily, rather than having to think of another synonym. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html