Kārlis Repsons venit, vidit, dixit 17.06.2009 09:57:
> On Saturday 13 June 2009 15:45:04 you wrote:
>> Kārlis Repsons venit, vidit, dixit 13.06.2009 17:26:
>>> Hi,
>>> It would be good to know what did Linus meant, when he said "and they
>>> will fail" about people, who would try changing some git projects'
>>> history (that is, the content, that is added already)? If I loose my
>>> repository completely, can I still know, that those contributions there
>>> are the same after I pull and how? What contents can be deleted, while
>>> still retaining consistency?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kārlis
>>
>> The sha1 ("object name") of a commit depends not only on its contents,
>> but on all its predecessors. So if you know one commit's sha1 to be
>> "original" you know for all its ancestors.
>>
>> Michael
>
> So, if I clone someone else's git archive, sha1 of a known commit must be
> compared and what else? How to check if all of archive's sha1-s are identical
> to its contents and every content is included?
As I said: if the sha1 of one commit agrees with what what you have or
know then, automatically, all ancestry is "original": commits as well as
contents.
You can check the repo itself using "git fsck", this makes sure that all
referenced content is included.
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html