On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:55:01AM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > This discussion seems to have stalled... > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:57:52PM +0200, Mikael Magnusson wrote: > > 2009/3/29 Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 18:13:47 +0100, Marcin Owsiany > > > <porridge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> As you can see, "master" sprang back to life after the last command. > > > > > > It looks like git-svn does not like a repo without 'master'. It seems > > > the problem was caused by this patch: > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=commit;h=1e889ef36c45b5554f7e317493ed3f4f901f8d9f > > > > > > I have added Eric to CC... > > > > Why not just check if HEAD points to a valid commit, rather than > > master? It should do the same > > in the newly created repo case, and stop annoying people on updates. > > There seems to be agreement that while conventions are nice, git should > not force branch names on people. Can someone implement Mikael's > suggestion? [silence] OK, a different question, then: if I wrote a patch to implement the behaviour described by Mikael, would you consider including it? -- Marcin Owsiany <marcin@xxxxxxxxxx> http://marcin.owsiany.pl/ GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216 "Every program in development at MIT expands until it can read mail." -- Unknown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html