On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Junio C Hamano<gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As long as the "fork" is feature complete and the user does not have to > resort to git-core, even though it may share the same issue of user base > division, at least that would _help_ the users who choose the forked one, > who does not have to know the old-timer lingo and concepts. It would be a > much better solution than adding stupid synonyms to the existing system. > > But coming up with a consistent and complete fork that does not show > git-core (not just phrases but also underlying concepts) is a lot of work. > That is the primary reason why nobody did "gh". What would you think of adding eg to contrib? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html