[RF sanity check] send-email threading fixes (was Re: [PATCH 3/6] send-email: fix threaded mails without chain-reply-to)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> You were too polite to say "by a hidden code style change", instead of
> saying something stronger,...

Erm, I meant "you were very polite and said"...

In any case, here is what I came up with by reshuffling your six patches.

[PATCH 1/6] add a test for git-send-email for non-threaded mails
[PATCH 2/6] send-email: fix non-threaded mails
[PATCH 3/6] doc/send-email: clarify the behavior of --in-reply-to with --no-thread
[PATCH 4/6] send-email: fix threaded mails without chain-reply-to
[PATCH 5/6] add a test for git-send-email for threaded mails without chain-reply-to
[PATCH 6/6] send-email: fix a typo in a comment

The first three patches apply to the tip of 'maint', which is currently at
802f9c9 (diff.c: plug a memory leak in an error path, 2009-06-08).  The
first one exposes breakage introduced by 3e0c4ff and then the second one
fixes it.

Patch 4/6 applies on top of 15da108 to fix a breakage introduced by that
commit.  Together with the result of applying the first three patches to
maint, they fix --no-thread and --thread (without --chain-reply-to) cases.
The result can be verified by applying Patch 5/6 on top of them.

They will appear in tonight's 'pu'; the overall tip for the topic would be
at 479ad6b (unless I find breakages during the final testing).

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]