Re: [PATCH] fix handling of iconv configuration options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marco Nelissen <marcone@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 108a97f..3388036 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -385,6 +385,8 @@ AC_SUBST(NO_EXPAT)
>  # some Solaris installations).
>  # Define NO_ICONV if neither libc nor libiconv support iconv.
>
> +if test -z $NO_ICONV; then
> +
>  GIT_STASH_FLAGS($ICONVDIR)
>
>  AC_DEFUN([ICONVTEST_SRC], [
> @@ -431,6 +433,12 @@ GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($ICONVDIR)
>  AC_SUBST(NEEDS_LIBICONV)
>  AC_SUBST(NO_ICONV)
>
> +if test -n $NO_ICONV; then
> +    NEEDS_LIBICONV=
> +fi
> +
> +fi
> +

Hmm, have you tested this with both NO_ICONV defined and undefined?

Because ...

	$ test -z ; echo $?
        0
	$ test -n ; echo $?
        0

... I would feel better if you had dq around $NO_ICONV in both tests.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]