Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: mention 'git stash pop --index' option explicitly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:23:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> SZEDER Gábor <szeder@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > -'git stash' (show | drop | pop ) [<stash>]
> > +'git stash' (show | drop ) [<stash>]
> > +'git stash' pop [--index] [<stash>]
> >  'git stash' apply [--index] [<stash>]
> 
> Why not "(pop | apply) [--index]"?
> 
> Other than that looks sensible.

Dunno.  I didn't like it somehow, but could not tell why.  But even
then, I should have followed the convention of (show | drop).

Will resend both patch after dinner.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]