Re: [PATCH] Shift object enumeration out of upload-pack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Edelen <sirnot@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> okie dokie.  is this good?

No.  The above line should be after "---".

> From: Nick Edelen <sirnot@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] Shift object enumeration out of upload-pack

And these two are not necessary, as you are not forwarding somebody else's
mail nor sending from an account that you do not to be recorded as the
author (i.e. your RFC2822 "From: " header is the same as this one).

> Offload object enumeration in upload-pack to pack-objects, but fall
> back on internal revision walker for shallow interaction.  Test t5530
> updated to reflect mechanism change.

Here, "to reflect mechanism change" is not quite a good enough
description.  Your explanation to Nico was much better.

> Signed-off-by: Nick Edelen <sirnot@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>

By the way, the proposed commit log message describes what the patch does
(i.e. "shifts enumeration from one process to the other"), but does not
answer more important question.  Please say _why_ it is a good idea to do
so in the message.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]