Re: inconsistency with --abbrev=0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sverre Rabbelier, 31.05.2009:
> Heya,
> 
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 17:48, Markus Heidelberg
> <markus.heidelberg@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > What should --abbrev=0 behave like?
> 
> If the minimum is 4, then --abbrev=n with n < 4 should give an error
> saying that it should be >= 4, no?

This would break existing workflows. Currently --abbrev=[1-3] (and also
--abbrev=-n (negative numbers)) always display >=4 chars in all
commands. So you don't have to remind git's lower limit of 4, if you
just want to display as few chars as possible.
Only --abbrev=0 is different.

Markus

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]