Re: git & bug tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"~:'' þÿ0B0Š0L0h0F0T0V0D0~0W0_0" <j.chetwynd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> git & bug tracking**
> 
> what is the reason that bug tracking was not part* of the development
> and implementation of git?

[...]
> *the 'graphical' relationship between the git & bug tracking threads
> is of interest.
> beyond open source I'm interested in inviting naive users to
> participate in the development process, for instance by bug filing.
> 
> **found this related threads
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110117

Because while I think that Git gets distributed version control right,
there is still debate about how to do distributed bugtracking?
Because of "one tool for one thing" or "do one thing, and do it well"?
Because you might not need bugtracker or code review tool: mailing
list is sometimes well enough?

Or I have misunderstood you because you didn't explain what you meant
clearly enough?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]