Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear diary, on Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:08:17PM CEST, I got a letter > where Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> said that... > > Create merge strategy 'applyreject'. > > > > The applyreject merge strategy is a two head merge strategy which performs > > the merge by obtaining the diff between the common base and the branch > > being merged and applies it to the current branch using git-apply --reject. > > Consequently any failures are written to .rej files, rather than using > > the RCS <<<<<<< ======= >>>>>>> format. > > So, it's essentially the same as the classic resolve strategy, just > handling rejects differently? I think that should be more obvious from > its name, perhaps resolve-rej? Unfortunately. More ideally it would be a configurable feature of merge-recur that gets used rather than invoking the RCS merge. This is just a quick and dirty 3 line shell script to propose the concept. > .rej files, what a nuisance to handle those... :) A matter of opinion. :) -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html