Re: cvs import

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:04:13PM +0200, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Martin Langhoff wrote:
> >One thing that bothers me in the cvs2svn algorithm is
> >that is not stable in its decisions about where the branching point is
> >-- run the import twice at different times and it may tell you that
> >the branching point has moved.
> 
> Huh? Really? Why is that? I don't see reasons for such a thing happening 
> when studying the algorithm.
> 
that's certainly due to some hash being iterated. python intentionally
randomizes this to make wrong assumptions obvious.
there is actually a patch pending to improve the branch source selection
drastically. maybe this is affected as well.

> For sure the proposed dependency-resolving algorithm which does not rely 
> on timestamps does not have that problem.
> 
i think that's unrelated.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]