Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Re: user-manual: general improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> Maybe this was even discussed earlier in the thread (I didn't go back to
>>> look), but it should definitely be part of the commit message.
>>
>> The rule I followed is: change it to whatever looks best.
>
> "Looks best to me" is not something other people can follow to replicate
> the examples you set here to further "clean up" other parts of the
> documentation set or writing new sections to the document you touched up
> with this patch.
>
> I suspect that you would not deny the possibility of saying "The result
> looked better when I last looked at it, but now I think about it I do not
> know why I thought it looked better" three months down the line.
>
> It is not a rule.

The "guidelines" (not rules) I followed are a bit hard to explain,
I'll try to do that, but in the meantime would you deny that the patch
actually makes things a bit more consistent?

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]