Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > If a function takes (int ac, char **av), then people should be able to > depend on the usual convention of > > (1) for any i < ac, av[i] is not NULL; and > (2) av[ac] is NULL. Hmm, isn't potentially useful to be able to pass a sub-range (of a longer argv vector) to an ac/av function? In such a case, av[ac] may not be NULL. -Miles -- 97% of everything is grunge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html