Re: Marking abandoned branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Smirl wrote:

> On 9/13/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Well, visualisers IIRC shows only requested branches. The only place where
>> abandoned branches would show even when we probably don't want would be
>> --all... one can try to use --all --not refs/abandoned/*
> 
> In order to make the tools easier to use I would turn this around and
> make --all show all active branches and the use something like
> --include refs/abandoned to include the abandoned ones.

Not that easy. Usually one have only refs/heads and refs/tags... unless
one use --use-separate-remotes, and then one has refs/remotes/...

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]