Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Petr Baudis wrote: > >> Dear diary, on Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 05:17:59PM CEST, I got a letter >> where Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> said that... >> > Abandoned branches are common in CVS since it is not distributed. >> > People start working on something in the main repo and then decide it >> > was a bad idea. In the git world these branches usually don't end up >> > in the main repo. >> >> Can't you just toss the branch away in that case? :-) >> >> You could also stash the ref to refs/heads-abandoned/ instead of >> refs/heads/ if you want to keep the junk around for some reason. Of >> course you don't get the nice marker with explanation of why is this >> abandoned and who decided that, but you can just use an empty commit for >> the same purpose. > > ... or a tag (remember, you can stash a tag into refs/abandoned/, instead > of a commit) with the further benefit that you really cannot commit on top > of that. Or refs/Attic/ ;-) -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html