Re: [PATCH 0/3] log: prettier decorations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:22:03AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:

> In order to do that I had to change prettify_ref to prettify_refname because
> add_ref_decoration doesn't have the ref object.

Thanks, this 1/3 looks fine to me.

But:

> Felipe Contreras (3):
>   Change prettify_ref to prettify_refname
>   Prettify log decorations even more
>   Fix test for new log decorate

Shouldn't 2/3 and 3/3 just be squashed together? It looks like 3/3 fixes
tests broken in 2/3, so you are hurting bisectability if they don't
happen together.

Other than that, I think the intent of the change and the implementation
look fine.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]