Re: Google Code: Support for Mercurial and Analysis of Git and Mercurial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, A Large Angry SCM wrote:

> Another important criteria was which, both or neither of Git and Hg 
> would actually work and perform well on top of Google Code's underling 
> storage system and except to mention they would be using Bigtable, the 
> report did not discuss this. Git on top of Bigtable will not perform 
> well.

Actually, did we not arrive at the conclusion that it could perform well 
at least with the filesystem layer on top of big table, but even better if 
the big tables stored certain chunks (not really all that different from 
the chunks needed for mirror-sync!)?

Back when I discussed this with a Googler, it was all too obvious that 
they are not interested (and in the meantime I understand why, see my 
other mail).

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]