Scott Chacon <schacon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm working on a hg<->git bidirectional tool using Git as the > communication protocol, so there is a bunch of Hg metadata that I need > to keep in Git to ensure I can convert commits created in Hg back into > the exact same objects after they upload to the Git db and then come > back down. This means storing explicit rename info, branch names, etc > somewhere without messing up Git clients that want to work on the same > repo. So, I can keep this data in the commit message, but I thought > it would be cleaner to keep it as extra fields in the commit object > before the "\n\n" separator. Before I go too far down this road, is > there anything horrible that might happen in any of the core Git tools > if extra data is there? Not that I know of but it is highly unlikely that such a patch will be accepted, given the history of discussion around that area. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html