On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:38:52PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:18:15AM -0500, Michael Witten wrote: > > I think that we've already got that tutorial-esque style covered (I > > haven't read it in a while): > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gittutorial.html > > > > However, the User Manual should make a Mathematician happy. > > I'm all for making mathematicians happy. But, again, help?: > > - Specific examples? > - Patches? Please, patches? > - Suggested text? > - Suggested outline? > > There's no shortage of high-level ideas. What there's always a need for > more of is people willing to submit patches, respond to review, etc. I usually hate to "me too", but I really want to second this notion. We have been getting minor documentation fixups trickling in, and I think those really help, and maybe they eventually would make the documentation perfect. But I have the feeling we would benefit from somebody taking ownership and considering the big picture of how the documentation fits together, and then really pushing it forward with something concrete. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html