On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Sam Vilain wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> Now that the GSoC projects have been announced I can give you the good > >> news that one of our two projects is to optimise this stage in > >> git-daemon; I'm hoping we can get it down to being almost as cheap as > >> the workaround you described in your post. I'll certainly be using your > >> repository as a test case :-) > > > > Please keep me in the loop as much as possible. I'd prefer we're not in > > disagreement over the implementation only after final patches are posted > > to the list. > > Thanks Nico, given your close working knowledge of the pack-objects > code this will be very much appreciated. Perhaps you can first help > out by telling me what you have to say about moving object enumeration > from upload-pack to pack-objects? It is like a 25-line patch or so. I did it once, although the shalow clone support was missing from it. And somehow I managed to lose the patch while doing some reshuffling of unrelated bigger changes. Basically, you can pass the revision arguments to pack-objects directly instead of passing them to rev-list and piping rev-list's output to pack-objects. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html