On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Johannes Schindelin >> <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > if you're like me, you used Git for _way_ too long to really >> > understand how anybody can say that Git is hard to learn. The >> > concepts underlying Git have sunk so deep that I do not question them >> > anymore. >> > >> > But it is important to keep in mind that our concept of branches is >> > not intuitive: >> > >> > http://longair.net/blog/2009/04/16/git-fetch-and-merge/ >> > >> > In particular, we have some pretty confusing nomenclature when it >> > comes to branches, and we might want to think how to improve the >> > situation. >> > >> > Food for thought on a lazy Sunday afternoon. >> >> Probably in the same confusion department: >> http://blog.teksol.info/2009/04/15/beware-of-gits-content-tracking.html >> >> Is he right and is this the defined correct behavior? > > Could you please at least change the subject to something like "Something > else, was Re: ..." when you abduct the thread? sorry, will repost. I have to admit that I was 25% unsure whether this is related and the right/wrong context. oh and that number is exact :). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html