Hi, Dear diary, on Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:34:31PM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> said that... > - I think the clean-up promise of Git.pm is great (e.g. > safe_qx should be part of it not in git-svn alone). > > - I think Git.xs was a bit premature and raised the hurdle of > cleaning up and consolidating various core-wrappers from > existing Perl scripts into Git.pm and have them use Git.pm. > It would be nice if we can drop this part for now, and do a > bit more Perl-level clean-up first. > > - I think "repository" abstraction, if we are going to have > one, should be designed from the core level if we are going > to have it accessible from Git.xs. Unfortunately I am not > ready to invest great time and effort for core level > libification at this moment. I basically agree on all three points - I will try to submit a patch to implement get_object() purely in Git.pm reasonably soon, and will see about introducing some actually designed repository division abstraction when I get some time. I hope to see Git.xs come back again in few months, but for now I have to concur that we should go back to the drawing board. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise. Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html