Re: A look at some alternative PACK file encodings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> So I don't think we would gain that much using that encoding 
> unless/until the pack format is made completely incompatible due to 
> other changes, and that's something we should try to avoid as much as 
> possible anyway.

Ah, I'm sorry; I didn't realize that it was already used elsewhere in
the pack format and this was just code re-use.  That is indeed a good
reason to stick with what's already there.

I agree the savings are minimal, but if you're starting from scratch,
they're free, so why not use them?  I tried to show that the code
complexity is truly negligible.

I'm sorry I didn't realize the details of pack structure before.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]