Re: [PATCH v2] Fix buffer overflow in config parser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 03:50:35AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

>   2. Tests which happen to require perl as part of the testing.
> [...]
> Your usage falls into (2), none of which are marked (and if they are to
> be marked, then all of them should be, since there is otherwise no
> point).

I meant to add: it is still nice to avoid the use of perl in the test
scripts if we can (and I think we can in this instance, as other
responses have noted). If a patch were made to skip tests which use
perl, then the fewer tests we have to skip, the better.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]