Re: add -e, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2009, #02; Sun, 12)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Actually, I am beginning to hate the idea of having this in add -e, but 
> would prefer it to be in apply ("git apply $PATCH" could -- and should -- 
> complain when not being called with --unidiff-zero and encountering a 
> patch that should (but does not) have common context lines).

I think it already complains by rejecting.  The thing is, only "add -e"
knows that the patch being fed to apply is potentially manually corrupt by
the end user.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]