Re: [PATCH 5/5] docs/checkout: clarify what "non-branch" means

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think the question being posed is: Would unifying branch names across all 
> git commands (i.e., always accepting refs/heads/master as naming branch 
> master, and accepting master when that is unambiguous) sufficiently benefit 
> new users...

My knee-jerk reaction is that what you are saying is backwards.

When do new people even need to know about refs/heads vs refs/tags with
modern Porcelain command set?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]