Ferry Huberts (Pelagic) wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Ferry Huberts <ferry.huberts@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> In several places merge.keepBackup is used i.s.o. >>> mergetool.keepBackup. This patch makes it all >>> consistent for git >> A silly question. The above makes it sound as if both merge.keepBackup >> and mergetool.keepBackup are valid, but the latter is preferred, and your >> patch makes things consistent even though without it there is nothing >> broken per-se. >> >> Is that really is the case? >> >> Otherwise, perhaps the title and the message should read like this: >> >> Fix misspelled mergetool.keepBackup >> >> In several places mergetool.keepBackup was misspelled as merge.keepBackup. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ferry Huberts <ferry.huberts@xxxxxxxxxx> > > feel free to change it :-) > imho there has been way too much discussion for such a simple patch. > replying to myself :-) maybe 'way too much' is a bit strong. I think the part of the discussion about finding out what actually to do was good. the rest was a bit too much for my taste. but I'm still getting used to ways of the git.devel list :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html