Re: Fetching SHA id's instead of named references?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:06:46PM +0200, Klas Lindberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > What Johannes pointed out is that someone could fetch from your repo
> > _after_ you correct the mistake (if you don't control garbage
> > collection).
> 
> Aha, ok. But how then does submodule update work? Git will only see
> SHA keys for each submodule in the cotntainer tree commit, so how does
> it perform fetching of those (unnamed) references?

git submodule update just does "git fetch" and hopes that the required
commit appears. In practice this means that you (may) need to invent a
tag or a branch for all the submodules, otherwise they are not
fetchable.

This bit us pretty hard when we tried to use submodules earlier, so we
gave up. Maybe some day...

- Finn Arne
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]